Reaction

A prolonged vacuum at the ACC gives a wrong message

Dipan Nandy
Dipan Nandy

The long-standing leadership vacuum at the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) has created a reality where its inaction has become too glaring to ignore. With the last commission resigning in early March, the institution has been without top leadership for two months—not for lack of mandate, but due to the absence of those meant to exercise it. This is not a routine administrative delay but a structural breakdown with visible consequences.

Anti-corruption agencies depend on continuity. Without leadership, investigations slow and enforcement stalls. In this vacuum, even routine processes become uncertain. Decisions are delayed while files remain in limbo without oversight.

What is worse, corruption does not pause. When accountability weakens, opportunities for irregularities grow. A visibly weakened watchdog mechanism sends a signal that scrutiny can be bypassed and punishment delayed.

Continuity is essential in combating corruption. It is not just about responding to wrongdoing, but about ensuring consistent and uninterrupted action.

Beyond administrative delay, the most serious damage is the weakening of public confidence. Institutions like the ACC represents the principle that no one is above the law. When they become inactive, even briefly, that belief is shaken.

And once trust weakens, questions then arise not only about institutional effectiveness but also about the state’s commitment to accountability. Over time, this doubt spreads across the governance system.

The prolonged vacuum raises difficult questions. Why has the appointment process not been expedited? Why has such a vital institution been left in uncertainty after the sudden resignation of its leadership?

Appointing new leadership after a prolonged vacuum alone will not resolve the crisis. What is needed is a deliberate effort to rebuild public trust. The process must be swift and transparent. The appointments should be based on merit and integrity while safeguarding the commission’s independence.