Teletalk gets 10 MHz in 700 MHz band despite huge dues

The telecom regulator has decided to allocate 10 MHz from the highly valuable 700 MHz band to state-owned Teletalk, despite the operator owing around Tk 5,500 crore in spectrum fees and already holding significant unused or underused spectrum.

The decision was taken at a recent Bangladesh Telecommunication Regulatory Commission (BTRC) meeting, according to documents.

The 700 MHz band is considered globally valuable for wide coverage, strong indoor signal, low rollout cost, and suitability for rural-urban networks, including 5G. In Bangladesh, 45 MHz of the band is allocated for mobile use, while 20 MHz remains unused due to a legal dispute.

TIMELINE OF GOVT, REGULATORY ACTIONS

On February 8, just before the national election, the interim government, through the telecom ministry, sent a letter to BTRC instructing it to allocate 10 MHz of spectrum to Teletalk.

A day later, Teletalk applied for the spectrum.

On February 16, the ministry informed the regulator that Teletalk had proposed converting its unpaid dues -- including licence and spectrum fees -- into government equity, now under finance division review.

On April 9, BTRC sought guidance from the ministry on how Teletalk would pay for the allocation. On April 24, the ministry directed the regulator to proceed with the allocation, citing the need to reduce customer inconvenience in line with the government’s election manifesto.

The price was set at Tk 237 crore per MHz, matching the rate paid by Grameenphone for 10 MHz in January as the sole bidder in the auction.

The move means the government may forgo at least Tk 2,000 crore in revenue in the near term.

Only 5 MHz of available spectrum in this band will remain for Banglalink and Robi, both of which have large customer bases. The two operators did not join the latest auction, saying prices were too high.

Spectrum is a limited and valuable resource that countries manage carefully, as it is important for improving telecom services and generating government revenue. In Bangladesh, there have been concerns about spectrum management, particularly regarding Teletalk.

LARGE DUES AND UNUTILISED SPECTRUM

Teletalk holds 55.2 MHz across the 900, 1800, 2100, and 2300 MHz bands and serves around 68 lakh subscribers, giving it about 0.81 MHz per lakh users.

By comparison, Grameenphone has 137.4 MHz for 8.44 crore subscribers (0.16 MHz per lakh), Robi has 124 MHz for 5.74 crore users (0.22 MHz per lakh), and Banglalink has 80 MHz for 3.74 crore users (0.21 MHz per lakh).

Despite higher spectrum per subscriber, Teletalk’s voice and data service quality has been weaker than peers in BTRC quality tests over the years, and it has added only about 1 lakh subscribers in five years.

The operator has also not used 30 MHz in the 2300 MHz band acquired in the 2022 auction, despite rollout obligations, which is considered a breach of spectrum utilisation rules.

Teletalk’s total liabilities include Tk 120 crore in licence fees, Tk 102 crore in revenue sharing, Tk 5,506 crore in spectrum fees, and around Tk 62 crore in other charges.

EXPERT CRITICISM

“Private operators are required to follow strict rules, but public companies often do not face the same obligations, which creates a market imbalance,” said Khondaker Golam Moazzem, research director at the Centre for Policy Dialogue.

He added that large unpaid dues raise doubts about such firms’ ability to survive in a competitive market, noting they often rely on government support rather than efficiency.

TIM Nurul Kabir, a telecom expert, said, “Spectrum is a valuable resource and allocating it to an operator that cannot ensure good service or generate revenue is a poor regulatory decision.”

“The government needs a different approach to revive Teletalk rather than using up valuable resources. Such decisions are also anti-competitive,” he added.

Md Emdad ul Bari, chairman of BTRC, said the allocation was approved on the condition that spectrum charges would be converted into government equity.

He said this would not cause revenue loss, as funds would shift between state entities as equity investments.