Comments on news report

“Killed; obviously in 'shootout',” published on February 25, 2014

Truthprevails53
Good riddance obviously. The police should shoot the dead body once more just to make sure.

Zman7
Prison vans carrying dangerous criminals or extremists must be guarded by well-trained forces whose only task would be to detect and destroy enemy attacker/snatcher by pre-emptive measure. And this measure could have saved not only the lives of both constables and prisoners but also time, energy and resources in the long run.

Laughing Man
Why do police always try to avoid bringing the accused or criminals before the media? What are they (police) afraid of? That the names of prominent politicians might be disclosed?

Himukala
It is worrying that terrorism is rising to a new level in Bangladesh and people are being killed without justice. However, more tragic will be the role of human rights organisations like Amnesty International who may question the killing of this terrorist.

Shah Deeldar
Good riddance! Live by the sword, die by the sword!

Aasfisarwar
For the sake of knowing the truth, he should have been alive. Killing him in a “shootout” will raise more questions.

M. S. Islam
I fear to write anything!

Deep Purple Blue
The fellow was already under a death sentence so why did the law enforcers (or shall we say law breakers) had to unnecessarily add to the list of extrajudicial killings?

*****
“Some questions still unanswered” (February 25, 2014)

Ash C.
Under the present circumstances, these questions as well as the names of the real masterminds behind this gruesome carnage will remain unanswered. That is the answer for now.