Comments on news report
“Diplomacy in rescue act?” published on November 17, 2013
Molla A. Latif
Wonder what these outsiders are trying to do. Why can't our own people try it?
Mohammed Ismail
We want foreign intervention when any political crisis is created in our country. So this is not a new issue for us. Our political parties are liable for this situation.
Salim Ullah
After 40 years of our Independence, we are so hopelessly stuck in narrow thoughts and action that whenever political crisis appears in our country, our leaders fail to resolve it. Then foreign masters emerge, and they start poking their nose into our internal matters and dictate; only then our heart bleeds for such humiliation. Isn't it very shameful and disgraceful and belittling us in the eyes of other countries?
Zman7
BNP has now decided not to enforce any hartal during Biswal's visit. But when your own country's important ministers or the head of the government requests to stop hartal, you don't listen and you continue imposing hartal and violence to burn, kill and injure innocent people.
Shahin Huq
We may not need mercy from the international community. What we need is a guarantee that our next government will be elected democratically and will not come to power through a compromise among big, powerful countries.
****
“Yes, India in talks with US, others” (November 17, 2013)
Shahin Huq
That means, to people like Pankaj Saran, the votes of Bangladeshi people do not count. Through 'diplomatic talks' they want to decide who will be the next government in Bangladesh. Is it democracy? Will Pankaj Saran tolerate such a democracy in India?
Salim Ullah
This is the manifestation of utter failure of our political leaders. How disgraceful for an independent nation!
An Observer
Why and how secular India contributes to build a 'dining hall cum library' for a religious group in her neighbouring country? Is not India allergic to Muslim fundamentalism in Bangladesh? Is it encouraging secularism in Bangladesh by contributing to religious organisations?
Alekanda
Secularism doesn't mean to disrespect other religion rather believing in a religious harmony and supporting other religious groups for the welfare of people who are peaceful and not involved in terrorism.
An Observer
Yes, Mr Alekanda, I understand what secularism is. My objection of Indian involvement and mingling with Bangladeshi religious group is for other reasons. India could use this money to help her own ultra poor rather than building dining hall and library (must be containing religious books) for a Bangladeshi religious group. If you are a supporter of madrasa building in Bangladesh, I suppose I am wrong expecting you to support my objection.
For all latest news, follow The Daily Star's Google News channel.
Comments