Partisan selection of VCs is concerning

The government’s latest decision to appoint vice-chancellors to seven major public universities—including Dhaka, Chittagong and Rajshahi—has once again brought into focus the continued trend of political considerations in academic appointments. Despite repeated calls for a merit-based and accountable system at our public universities, the latest selections appear to signal a return to the old practice of partisan appointments, which is regrettable.

Among the newly appointed VCs, most have direct or indirect affiliations with the ruling party, either holding party positions or having been active in the aligned teachers’ organisations. We saw a similar trend during past regimes when leadership positions at universities were often awarded on the basis of political loyalty. Such practices have historically encouraged academics to engage in partisan activities. After the July uprising, people hoped for a break from this culture, but those expectations remained unfulfilled as institutional procedures were not followed in VC appointments even during the interim government’s tenure.

While the rules in several universities require the VCs to be appointed by senate-elected panels, the senate elections themselves have frequently been delayed or not held at all, allowing appointments to proceed without proper consultation. Even where mechanisms such as search committees have been established, they have not been consistently employed. BNP, in its election manifesto, pledged to build a “non-discriminatory, merit-based and accountable state” and to establish a “merit-based, transparent, efficient and people-oriented administration in all state institutions.” The latest VC appointments do not appear to reflect these commitments.

The education minister has defended these appointments, arguing that political engagement is not a disqualification and that selections were based on qualifications and performance. While participation in politics is a democratic right, it cannot be allowed to overshadow the need for neutrality and integrity in academic leadership. Universities require administrators who can rise above partisan lines and uphold the principles of fairness, transparency, and academic excellence. Otherwise, they risk becoming extensions of political interests rather than centres of independent thought and learning.

We urge the government to break away from the old practice of partisan appointments at public universities. It should lead by example, strictly adhering to established procedures when filling key academic positions. It must learn from past mistakes and ensure academic freedom at all costs. Otherwise, it will be difficult to strengthen academic standards and institutional credibility. Overall, the government must act decisively to prioritise merit, transparency, and independence in university governance.