As an expatriate well-wisher of Bangladesh, I offer these observations. Within the past year both India and Sri Lanka conducted elections according to their respective constitutions which were administered by the incumbent party. In both cases the opposition party won and power was handed over peacefully by the incumbent to the winner. In Bangladesh however, the opposition party, which had strong momentum after winning five mayoral elections, chose not to participate in an election administered by the incumbent party according to the constitution. To those calling for “restraint”, “dialogue,” and “political space,” I ask these questions. Restraint, yes obviously, the arsonists, vandals, and those conducting blockades, and those paying them and coordinating their efforts need to “restrain” themselves. To those calling for “dialogue,” how is it possible to “dialogue” with arsonists, vandals, and blockaders who seem to seek nothing but power itself and that through violent means. To those calling for “political space,” for what purpose; for more extensive arson, vandalism and blockades?

“Why will the government give compensation? Why don't you seek it from those carrying out sabotage … giving orders sitting in Gulshan? Why don't you file cases against them? Hundreds of cases.”