Preferential governance?
Theoretically, we all want democratic general elections. But the reality is different (in Dhaka). The incoming, elected regime is attracted towards some sectors; and neglect many sectors which need BMR of BMRE. This pattern is not changing. The motivation is not public service.
The new super AL+ plus regime is still groping for its long term bearing after the first 100 days. Too many external diversions, at home and abroad. Our public institutions are breaking down. During the current global recession, it is not easy to make things look bright.
And, why this hurry for mega projects? Easily explained: our political culture has no respect for continuity of projects, when a regime changes, don't leave 'it' to others!
Re-tenders and re-tendering are the standard practice, causing delays and systems losses, decade after decade. Too many ten-perent-wallas around? Recognition of loyalty begs for monetary compensation.
This is an entrenched weakness in dynasty rules (anywhere in the world). Dhaka had been under the grips of two political parties for decades. The non-political caretaker government tried for two years to bring about a change in the philosophy of approach. The system has to be cleaned by the politicians themselves.
The reports on BDR tragedy are awaited eagerly by the whole world. It is a sensitive issue. The other issue is also sensitive ('71 war criminals). Global changes are occurring fast, hence the local regimes have fewer options. When the mighty USA could change, why not micro Bangladesh?
What is happening in Pakistan? Bangladesh is also not immune to the activities of the religious extremist groups. A background point has to be remembered: external cartels could hire and employ such terrorists. Saddam fought for the Americans in Iran several years: then note what happened to him. The Russians in Afghanistan had to withdraw--who were the organisers and the fighters?
Routine political administration is out of date.
Comments