Justice system and media
When we have faith in the judiciary which we believe is independent, why should the media and some sections indulge in campaigns against the judgment? Justice cannot be influenced by signature campaigns and demonstrations. The media outlets are reacting now more than they reacted when the crimes were committed. The common man is tired. S/He wants the media to find everlasting solutions to prevent the recurrence of such crimes so that they can be hailed as a true pillar of democracy. All successful newspapers are ceaselessly querulous and bellicose. They never defend anyone or anything if they can help it; if the job is forced on them, they tackle it by denouncing someone or something else.
While strong public opinion, ably backed by proactive and dynamic media, is a healthy sign of a vibrant democracy, of late we have been witness to the people interfering with the judicial process by either demanding instant justice or criticizing the judicial pronouncements in high profile cases. This is a dangerous trend because it exerts undue moral pressure on judges. Justice requires that to lawfully constituted Authority there be given that respect and obedience which is due; that the laws which are made shall be in wise conformity with the common good; and that, as a matter of conscience all men shall render obedience to these laws. Justice consists not in being neutral between right and wrong, but in finding out the right and upholding it, wherever found, against the wrong. Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.
For all latest news, follow The Daily Star's Google News channel.
Comments