LDC graduation must trigger structural reform to attract FDI

Bangladesh’s graduation from the United Nations’ list of least developed countries (LDCs) is a historic achievement, reflecting decades of economic, human and social progress. Yet it will also bring a difficult transition. Duty-free market access, export incentives, concessional finance and other trade privileges will gradually diminish, exposing weaknesses long masked by preferential treatment.

The formal graduation date is November 24, 2026, although the government has requested a three-year extension of the preparatory period. Whether graduation occurs as scheduled or is delayed, Bangladesh cannot treat additional time as a reason for complacency. It must be used for structural reforms to sustain growth, strengthen competitiveness and attract more foreign direct investment. 

Tap here to add The Daily Star as a trusted source

FDI is not merely capital; it also brings technology, modern management, workforce development, access to international markets and quality employment. These benefits will be important as Bangladesh seeks to diversify exports and move towards higher-value manufacturing and services.

Yet FDI inflows remain modest relative to the economy’s size and potential. Net inflows stood at around $1.27 billion in 2024 and rose to approximately $1.77 billion in 2025, still around 0.4 percent of GDP. Vietnam, India and Indonesia attract many times more investment. Bangladesh has major advantages: a large market, a young workforce, a strategic location and a manufacturing base. What it lacks is a predictable, transparent and efficient investment environment.

Investors plan over five-to-ten-year horizons. They consider not only labour costs and market size, but also policy continuity, contract security, institutional stability, energy availability, tax predictability and dispute resolution. Abrupt changes in investment and tax policy with changes of government undermine confidence, regardless of individual incentives.

Recent economic pressures make these concerns more urgent. Bangladesh has faced high inflation, pressure on foreign exchange reserves, non-performing loans and political uncertainty. Although remittances and reserves have improved, inflation, banking-sector weakness and low investor confidence persist. A stable and elected government is important, but investors also need institutions that ensure continuity and consistent application of the law.

These vulnerabilities will become more visible after graduation. The European Union’s Everything But Arms (EBA) facility will continue during a transitional period, but exports, especially ready-made garments, will eventually face higher tariffs. Vietnam already enjoys preferential access to major markets through free trade agreements. 

Bangladesh cannot continue to rely mainly on low wages and tariff concessions. Future competitiveness must come from productivity, technology, skills, environmental compliance, efficient public services and reliable infrastructure.

Regional competitors show what sustained reform can achieve. Vietnam has attracted substantial FDI by simplifying investment rules, improving licensing, strengthening investor protections, offering long-term incentives and joining trade agreements, including the EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement, CPTPP and RCEP. Indonesia has used industrial incentives, tax relief and targeted policies in minerals and electric vehicles. India is strengthening manufacturing through “Make in India,” infrastructure investment and production-linked incentives.

Bangladesh’s high tariffs, regulatory complexity and limited participation in free trade or preferential agreements stand in contrast. Closing this gap requires more than investment conferences, road shows or short-term tax breaks. It requires sustained policy reform, stronger trade links, better infrastructure and an improved investment climate.

The first barrier is administrative uncertainty. Investors must deal with multiple agencies for registration, taxation, environmental clearance, land, utilities, customs and foreign exchange. Although a one-stop service exists, many procedures remain fragmented, and online applications may still require physical visits and repeated follow-up.

The Bangladesh Investment Development Authority should become a genuine single investment authority. Relevant services should be integrated into one platform with fixed decision deadlines. For low-risk applications, conditional or deemed approval should be considered when agencies fail to respond on time.

Energy supply is another obstacle. Power outages, low gas pressure, delayed connections and rising fuel costs disrupt production and force firms to rely on expensive generators. Industrial zones need firm service standards, clear connection deadlines and predictable pricing. 

Bangladesh must expand domestic gas exploration, diversify import sources, modernise energy infrastructure and increase renewable generation. Priority supply to industrial and economic zones would reduce costs and investment risk.

Tax and regulatory stability matter more to investors than simply low tax rates. Frequent policy changes, complex procedures, high compliance costs and slow dispute resolution weaken confidence. Separating tax policy from administration and expanding digital systems are positive steps, but digitisation should simplify compliance rather than create new reporting or audit burdens. 

Investment incentives should be linked to measurable outcomes, including jobs, exports, research, technology transfer, local sourcing and lower carbon emissions, rather than broad tax exemptions.

Profit repatriation is equally important. Foreign firms need assurance that legitimate dividends, royalties, loan repayments and share-sale proceeds can be transferred promptly. Foreign exchange shortages, tax complications, pre-approval requirements and inconsistent bank interpretations weaken that assurance. Bangladesh should introduce clear rules, a single digital process and fixed settlement timelines, with automatic approval for routine transactions where feasible.

Industrial land and logistics remain persistent problems. Acquiring land, verifying ownership, changing land use and securing utilities can take years. Investors should have a digital database showing the location, ownership, price, legal status and utility connectivity of industrial plots. Rather than declaring numerous economic zones without completing them, the government should develop a smaller number with reliable infrastructure and efficient administration.

Ports and customs must also be modernised. Delays in cargo handling, clearance and inland transport increase inventory, tie up working capital and raise costs. Risk-based inspections, pre-arrival processing and the national single window should become operational, supported by greater port and transport capacity.

Unfair practices across different sectors and slow dispute resolution add further risk. Investors assess not only the ease of entry but also whether disputes will be handled fairly and efficiently. Prolonged litigation, opaque administrative decisions and limited avenues for appealing government actions discourage long-term commitments. 

Specialised commercial courts, faster enforcement of arbitration awards and simpler appeal procedures are therefore essential. Digital monitoring, auditable records and transparent complaint systems would further reduce informal costs and administrative abuse.

The banking sector and foreign exchange system must also be strengthened. Reducing default loans, improving bank governance and restoring confidence in foreign exchange management are indispensable to a credible investment climate.

Bangladesh should pursue free trade agreements and comprehensive economic partnerships with the European Union, the United Kingdom and other major markets in South America and Africa. At the same time, it must strengthen compliance with the labour, human rights, environmental and governance standards required to qualify for GSP Plus.

Investment promotion should focus on pharmaceuticals, agro-processing, electronics, light engineering, information technology, medical devices, logistics and renewable energy. Priority should go to projects that create skilled jobs, transfer technology and link strongly with local supply chains.

LDC graduation need not mean the loss of Bangladesh’s existing advantages. It can instead mark the beginning of structural transformation, shifting competitiveness from cheap labour and tariff preferences to technology, skills, productivity and good governance. 

Foreign investors ultimately need three assurances: stable policy, timely government services and fair application of the law. Bangladesh already has the market, workforce and location to become an investment destination. What it needs now is measurable, transparent and consistent reform.

That reform must begin before graduation, not after its costs become visible. If we address the barriers discussed above and create a more predictable and enabling investment environment, FDI can drive export diversification, technological progress and quality employment. If these reforms are left undone, Bangladesh risks falling further behind its regional competitors despite its considerable potential.

The writer is a fellow chartered accountant and financial sector analyst, and he can be reached at faysal.aqc@gmail.com.